#QIQQA VS DOCEAR PDF#

One of the big strengths of Zotero is how easily it can be extended using add-ons. I think given your preferences, Zotero is exactly what you're looking for and tons of people use it for exactly what you want. Compare Docear's commit history, with no commit for 3 months: with Zotero's Moreover (and I say that with lots of respect for Joeran and the folks at Docear), since Joeran, the lead developer has taken a private sector job, it's seeing very little development.

#QIQQA VS DOCEAR PDF#

What I really want is just to keep track of all of my article/chapter/book PDF files and be able to more easily generate bibtex entries.ĭocear has an entirely different philosophy than other reference managers, so if you don't like what you see, it's probably not for you.

I'm really not interested in Mendeley given that it's proprietary software, and really the only proprietary stuff I'll use is games or firmware/gpu binary blobs.ĭocear looks like it should be the most useful to me, based on this: īut when I open up Docear, it comes up with weird mind-mapping charts, and wants me to create projects etc. relevant to my research, subcategorised by topic.įor BibTeX, I usually generate these more or less by hand using ebib in Emacs.ĭo people with vaguely simliar needs find Docear, Mendeley, or Zotero useful? I'm mainly interested in better organising my PDF collection and better handling of BibTeX entries.Įssentially my current PDF setup is that I have a folder where I keep PDF versions of articles, books, etc. I'm interested in determining whether any of Docear, Mendeley, Zotero would actually be useful in my workflow.

Qiqqa vs docear